Uniswap [UNI] Price Prediction 2023-2024: a16z Could Control Governance?

• Uniswap [UNI] holders have called out a16z, a Silicon Valley venture capitalist firm, for allegedly controlling the decision and proposal approval process of Uniswap.
• Data from Bubblemaps, a blockchain data visualiser, showed that a16z owns 4.15% of the total UNI supply which is enough to pass any proposal.
• Decentralized technology advocate Chris Blec raised concern about the irregularities in the voting system as Binance CEO CZ was surprised to hear about it.

Uniswap [UNI] Holders Question Operational Model

Uniswap [UNI] holders who have stuck to the protocol for a long while might need clarity on the operational model of the project. This is because evidence flying around suggests that a16z, the Silicon Valley venture capitalist firm, controls the decision and proposal approval processes of Uniswap. Recently, UNI dropped 5%, making some UnisWap holders wonder if they are being lied to about how their protocol is governed.

a16z’s Influence on Proposals

Bubblemaps, the blockchain data information visualizer confirmed that a16z could have been influencing most Uniswap proposals. The investment firm owns 4.15% of the total UNI supply which is enough to pass any proposal and 0.25% supply is required to submit one as well – one wallet belonging to a16z sent such proposal recently and this stirred up conversations among users regarding its influence on governance within Uniswap’s platform and ecosystem .

Chris Blec’s Reaction

Decentralized technology advocate Chris Blec knocked the institution for using its voting power to distort a UNI proposal to launch on the Binance Coin [BNB] chain while Binance CEO CZ was surprised by this disclosure. Blec responded that he had known about these irregularities for some time now despite Uniswap touting itself as having 310,000 members with full say over its governance and utilization of its $1.6 billion treasury – leading some retail investors to feel sidelined in comparison with big whales owning significant amounts of tokens who can control votes instead..

Divided Reactions From Community

The revelation has caused divided reactions from users online – some saw nothing wrong in it while others argued against it being dishonest or not following what Uniswap preaches as DeFi protocol – however there has been no official response from Uniswap at this time yet regarding these claims made against them alluding towards their operational model being manipulated by outside influences rather than decentralized decisions made solely by stakeholders/members within their ecosystem .


In conclusion , although there are still many unanswered questions at this moment such as whether or not these claims are true or false , it will be important for Uniswap stakeholders/members alike to gain clarity on how exactly their platform functions so they can make informed decisions moving forward with regards to future investments or proposals submitted through their DAO-based system .